A Dialog on Hinduism – Conclusion
- I now have a broad idea about the greatness of our philosophy and religion. I have a few doubts in regard to certain points which you mentioned.
Now , there are certain passages, in our accecpted authorities like the Vedas, Sastras, Puranas and Divya Prabandha, which appear to be mutually contradictory. So , which one should we take, as correct? - We have two types of duties. The first type consists of compulsory duties like sandhya vandana; and the other type of desirable duties, such as going to temples or making garlands for the Lord. Which is more important?
- There are two types of duties: 1) One is, doing thing laid down by sastras. 2) The other is, not doing things, which are prohibited by sastras.
Between the two, which is more important? - What is the importance of acharya and bhagavatas in our system of philosophy?
- how should the acharya treat a disciple?
- Between the service to the archarya and service to the bhagavatas,which is more important?
- It is generally accepted that serving somebody is not an act of happiness, and this has to be avoided. Then, how do we say that even in moksha, service is done to the Lord?
How does this service to the Lord and Lakshmi, give pleasure to jivatma? - The Vedas, particularly Atharva Veda, have laid down acts, for achieving bad objectives like destruction of enemies. Why should the Vedas teach such bad things also?
- Just as wwe do not adopt what is mentioned about destruction of enemies, in the Vedas, can we say that we should not adopt bhakti yoga also?
- It is said that bhakti yoga has to be performed throughout this life; and, perhaps, in the following lives also, until salvation is attained. But prapatti has to be done only once and is sure of giving salvation at the end of this life itself. Thus, prapatti seems to be much simpler, as compared to bhakti yoga.
- I have heard that everyday, we have to do five kinds of service to the Lord. What are they?
- I agree that doing the compulsory duties and karmas, like sandhyavandana, is necessary; because it is ordained in the sastras; and their non-performance will result in the displeasure to the Lord and invite punishment by the Lord. But, what is the need for doing recommended duites, like going to the temple, lighting up the lamps in the temple, presenting garlands to the Lord in the temple?
- You have been telling me the basic priniciples of our philosophy and religion. What would you advise, regarding the books to be referred to, for further details?
- My holidays are coming to a close. Have you still got much left?
We should understand that really there is no difference between these various authorities. We have to properly interpret, and reconcile the apparently contradictory statements.
In some cases, to praise a particular thing, the scriptures may overpraise it. In all such instances a proper interpretation will have to be done to resolve the apparent inconsistencies.
Obviously, the compulsory duties are more important. Because,if these are not done,this results in sin(papa). But, if you do not do desirable activities, no sin accurs. Hence it is more important to do compulsory duties.
It is more important to avoid things, which have been prohibited by sastras; like drinking liquor or taking meat. Doing things, as prescribed by sastras, comes next. It is only a question of degree and importance.
The importance of acharya is even greater than that of God.
Bhagavatas or the disciples of God, have to be treated as even superior to the Lord. When such is the case, for bhagavatas or God’s disciples; in the case of acharya, this is even more so and does not require any emphasis.
The highest respect is to be given to the acharya; and the service to the acharya is even more important than service to God.
The acharya should test the disciple, as to whether he is really interested in our lofty principles. Then the acharya should teach him everything, without omission. Whatever he has been taught by his acharya, he should gladly teach his disciple, so that the disciple gets the full benefit.
1) Service to the acharya is the most important.
2) Next comes service to bhagavatas.
3) After that only comes service to the Lord.
The statement that service to somebody produces unhappiness is only a general statement. There are exeptions.
When we do service to somebody, who is dear to us, it is not an act of unhappiness, but in reality it produces pleasure.
For example, a wife does service willingly to her husband, and derives a lot of pleasure in doing so.
similarly, service to the Lord is also an act of pleasure.
Actually, these are not normally to be followed. but the Vedas, being kind to humanity, want that they should study the Vedas and do good acts.
As an incentive for the ordinary people to develop faith in the Vedas, they have prescribed methods for achieving destruction of enemies. So, the bad persons, by following these methods, achieve their objective of defeat of enemies.
Then they develop faith in the Vedas.They thenread the more important things, the jnana kanda. This wll help them to develop faith in the good things and finally to do bhakti or prapatti and attain salvation.
The Gita also says that Veda is like a tank or lake. In thebig tank or lake, we take only that much water, as is required for our bathing and drinking.
Similarly, the Vedas contain prayers or methods fordifferent purposes; for defeat of enemies, for getting wealth or cows in this world, for getting svarga after death, for attaining moksha, and so on.
We must only follow what will help us in our goal in life, just as we would take only as much water from the tank as is required.
The two are entirely different.Bhakti yoga has been prescribed as a means for attaining moksha. Different vidyas, in the bhakti yoga, have also been described at length. These are for the ultimate objective of attaining moksha.
So, this cannot be compared with the procedure laid down in the Vedas regarding destruction of enemies; since Bhakti yoga is one of the means of attaining salvation.
Yes, in one way, what you say is correct. But you should have absolute faith in the efficacy of prapatti; and you have also to adopt the accessories, like decision to do what is pleasing to the Lord; to avoid, what is not pleasing to the Lord. So, the adoption of these accessories, particularly the absolute and full faith, is also very difficult. In any case, we go by the sastras and we accept the truth of what is mentioned in the sastras.
They are 1) Abhigamana 2) Upadana 3) Ijya 4) Svadhyaya 5) Yoga.
1) Abhigamana – First in the morning after bath and sandhyavandana, we pray to god that all services required to be done to Him during the day should be done without any hindrance.
2) Upadana – The next is to collect flowers, tulasi and other accessories for the aradhana of the Lord. Also, we read or learn the sacred works of the Alwars and Acharyas.
3) Ijya – The third is to perform aradhana to the Lord.
4) Svadhyaya – The fourth is to read in the afternoon the vedantic portions; and discuss with like-minded people, philosophy and deeper meanings of the texts.
5) Yoga – The fourth is to bed, meditating on the holy feet of the Lord; and thinking that we are keeping our head at the Lord’s feet.
I agree that such duties are not compulsory, but are only recommended. so, if such duties are not performed, they will not result in any displeasure to the Lord or invite punishment by the Lord.
But, if such things are done, they result in the pleasure to the Lord. So, such recommended duties should also be performed for the pleasure of the Lord.
There are four most important books, which we should study under an Acharya. These are:
1) Sri Ramanuja’s commentary on Brahma Sutra, called “Sri Bhashya”.
2) Sri Ramanuja’s commentary on Bhagavad Gita, called “Gita Bhashya”.
3) The commentary of Kurukesa(Pillan) on Tiruvaimozhi of Nammalwar.Because the whole Tiruvaimozhi is concerning the Lord and His auspicious qualities, this commentary is called “Bhagavad Vishayam” or “subject concerning the Lord”.
4) “Rashasya Traya Sara” or “The essence of the three secrets” of Sri Desika.
By learning the above four sacred works, the principles of our philosophy will be well understood. Also, the view points of other systems of philosophy, and how they are refuted by us, can also be learnt. It is our sacred duty to learn these works under the feet of an Acharya.
Knowledge is an ocean. However much you read, you find that you have to read and learn a lot more. I have so far told you the important principles of our Visishtadvaita philosophy and Sri Vaishnavite way of life, broadly called religion.
I will be very happy, if what I have told could induce a further desire in you, to learn more and more about our sacred religion and philosophy.
I want that our talks so far, should kindle in you an interest to learn more and more, and benefit by them.
I wish you all the best.
Tags: conclusion
5 Responses to “A Dialog on Hinduism – Conclusion”
October 9th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
Respected Swamin : I read almost all your writings on ‘a dialog on Hinduism’ with deep interest. They are lucidly expressed for quick and easy understanding. Dhanyosmi for your sincere efforts. I invoke the ALMIGHTY to bless you with sound health and happiness. Adiyen daasan
October 9th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
All credits go to Sri V.N.Gopala Desikan swAmin.
I hope and pray that these articles reach younger generation.
adiyEn
rAmAnuja dAsan
October 15th, 2008 at 8:54 am
Is it our Lord Narayana is similar to Christian God that he punishes those who do not send prayers to Him…..Why we should get sin for not doing Sandhya vandanam ??
October 21st, 2008 at 9:20 am
Swamin,i read this book in 2004 and since had only loved it.I was refered to by an elderly SriVaishnava.Actually,when searching my Grandpa’s Library he too had one copy of this.So,its a must have in every house and family.Its price had always been very very affordable.Even now though it has increased 100 p.c. plus still it would be hardly some Rs.100 to Rs.150.And the knowledge that it provides is oceanic.Many publishers would have priced it much higher with some illustrations and pics.Say,even Rs.500 or so.But,thanks to Swamin and other publishers they have taken the right way of approach.Pls dont inc the cost anymore.Thanks once again for contributing so much.
Jai Shriman Narayana
November 29th, 2008 at 10:27 pm
Dear Damodaran,
Emperumaan is the greatest and the closest bandhu whom we are extremely lucky to share a close relationship with.
This relationship is eternal, and he showers his eternal grace on us.
Adiyen doesn’t want to comment on other gods, we just don;t need to think of any other gods who are not even one trillonth part in terms of greatness compared to the supreme.
Emperumaan never punishes anybody that we didn’t offer prayer to him, instead he always thinks of our upliftment
When this comes to Sandhyavandanam, it is the ardent duty of Brahmana/Kshatriya to perform the same. Sandhayvandanam is a MUST for all brahmanas, and if we are not performing them implies we are not following shastrams/not adhering to Emperumaan’s order.
Obviously once incurrs sin, if he is not performing Thrikaala Sandhyavandanam as per Lord’s order. This doesn’t mean that he hates anybody. Emperumaan always thinks to uplift us, and uttering his name/performing an Anjali with a request that this will not be repeated again will immediately quench his anger. We should keep our words after that.
Performing Sandhyavandanam is a duty, and by doing this regularly, is a mark of respect we are giving to the Lord.
For eg, the duty of a doctor is to treat. Suppose a patient registers to a hospital and is not treated by anybody, how will be the reaction of public. They will get angry saying it was duty of doctor to treat. Similar is here, whenever we slip from our duties, Emperumaan lso gets angry.
Leave a Reply